Shearman Logo

balance scale

May 21, 2013

US District Court Rejects Talley and Permits a Business Expense Deduction for Part of Double Damages Payment Under the False Claims Act

Subscribe

Jump to...

 
In a taxpayer-favorable decision earlier this month, the US District Court for the District of Massachusetts, following a jury verdict, entered judgment for a corporation in a tax refund suit permitting a business deduction for payments made to the government to resolve potential liability under the False Claims Act (“FCA”) (31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733), and other statutory and common law causes of action. In Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. v. US, 2013 WL 1946216, Case No. 08-12118-DPW (D. Mass. May 9, 2013), Judge Douglas P. Woodlock upheld a jury verdict for Fresenius and awarded the taxpayer a refund of $50,420,512.00 plus interest. The award reflected the jury’s finding that the majority of double damages payments that the IRS claimed were punitive and therefore ineligible for a deduction as ordinary and necessary under Internal Revenue Code § 162(a) were, in fact, compensatory and therefore deductible. In permitting the case to proceed to trial, the district court rejected the test to determine if payments constitute compensatory damages set forth in Talley Indus., Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 1999-200, aff’d 18 F. App’x 661 (9th Cir. 2001), and allowed Fresenius to present evidence beyond the terms of the settlement agreements to determine if all or some of the payments were made in settlement of non-punitive FCA liability.

View full memo, "US District Court Rejects Talley and Permits a Business Expense Deduction for Part of Double Damages Payment Under the False Claims Act

Authors and Contributors

Laurence Bambino

Partner

Tax

+1 212 848 4213

+1 212 848 4213

New York

Thomas Johnston

Partner

Tax

+1 202 508 8022

+1 202 508 8022

Washington DC