Shearman & Sterling LLP multinational law firm headquartered in New York City, United States.

balance scale

May 03, 2016

Second Circuit Holds Sarbanes-Oxley’s Five-Year Statute of Repose Applies to Claims Under Sections 9(f) and 18(a), but Re-Affirms That Three-Year Repose Period Applies to Section 14 Claims

Subscribe

Jump to...

 

Twenty-five years ago, in Ceres Partners, the Second Circuit held that the implied private right of action under Section 14 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) was subject to a three-year repose period, based on analogizing such claims to the express private rights of action in Sections 9(f) and 18(a) of the Exchange Act and then borrowing those statutes’ then-applicable three-year statutes of repose.   In 2002, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (“SOX”) extended to five years the repose period applicable to private rights of action involving claims of “fraud, deceit, manipulation, or contrivance.”   In DeKalb County Pension Fund v. Transocean Ltd., No. 14-0894-cv (2d Cir. Apr. 29, 2016), the Second Circuit reexamined its Ceres holding in light of SOX, and (1) resolving disagreements among district courts within the Second Circuit, held that claims under Sections 9(f) and 18(a) are subject to SOX’s five-year statute of repose, but (2) claims under Section 14 are nevertheless still subject to a three-year statute of repose.  The Transocean Court further held that Section 14’s repose period begins to run on the date of the defendant’s last culpable act or omission — i.e., when the allegedly misleading proxy statement was issued — not when the plaintiff’s claim may have accrued or been discovered.

View full memo, Second Circuit Holds Sarbanes-Oxley’s Five-Year Statute of Repose Applies to Claims Under Sections 9(f) and 18(a), but Re-Affirms That Three-Year Repose Period Applies to Section 14 Claims

Authors and Contributors

Jaculin Aaron

Partner

Litigation

+1 212 848 4450

+1 212 848 4450

New York

Stuart J. Baskin

Partner

Litigation

+1 212 848 4974

+1 212 848 4974

New York

Matthew L. Craner

Partner

Litigation

+1 212 848 5255

+1 212 848 5255

New York

Agnès Dunogué

Partner

Litigation

+1 212 848 5257

+1 212 848 5257

New York

Stephen Fishbein

Partner

Litigation

+1 212 848 4424

+1 212 848 4424

New York

Jerome S. Fortinsky

Partner

Litigation

+1 212 848 4900

+1 212 848 4900

New York

Alan S. Goudiss

Partner

Litigation

+1 212 848 4906

+1 212 848 4906

New York

John Gueli

Partner

Litigation

+1 212 848 4744

+1 212 848 4744

New York

Adam Hakki

Partner

Litigation

+1 212 848 4924

+1 212 848 4924

New York

Daniel H.R. Laguardia

Partner

Litigation

+1 415 616 1114

+1 415 616 1114

San Francisco

Christopher L. LaVigne

Partner

Litigation

+1 212 848 4432

+1 212 848 4432

New York

Daniel Lewis

Partner

Litigation

+1 212 848 8691

+1 212 848 8691

New York

John A. Nathanson

Partner

Litigation

+1 212 848 8611

+1 212 848 8611

New York

Brian H. Polovoy

Partner

Litigation

+1 212 848 4703

+1 212 848 4703

New York

Jeffrey J. Resetarits

Partner

Litigation

+1 212 848 7116

+1 212 848 7116

New York

William J. F. Roll, III

General Counsel

Litigation

+1 212 848 4260

+1 212 848 4260

New York

Richard F. Schwed

Partner

Litigation

+1 212 848 5445

+1 212 848 5445

New York

Patrick D. Robbins

Partner

Litigation

+1 415 616 1210

+1 415 616 1210

San Francisco

Mark D. Lanpher

Partner

Litigation

+1 202 508 8120

+1 202 508 8120

Washington DC

Brian G. Burke

Partner

Litigation

+1 212 848 7140

+1 212 848 7140

New York

Practices