March 20, 2014

Supreme Court to Review Second Circuit’s Decision that American Pipe Tolling Does Not Apply to the Securities Act’s Three-Year Statute of Repose

订阅

Jump to...

 

The Supreme Court of the United States has granted certiorari in Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi v. IndyMac MBS, Inc., taking up an issue that affects the management of class action securities litigation.  Specifically, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that the tolling rule of American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah, 414 U.S. 538 (1974)—tolling statutes of limitations for putative class members upon the commencement of a class action—does not apply to the three-year statute of repose that governs claims under Sections 11, 12(a), and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”).  See Police & Fire Ret. Sys. of Detroit v. IndyMac MBS, Inc., 721 F.3d 95 (2d Cir. 2013).  The Supreme Court’s review of the Second Circuit’s holding in IndyMac is likely to resolve an issue on which some courts have disagreed.

View full memo, Supreme Court to Review Second Circuit’s Decision that American Pipe Tolling Does Not Apply to the Securities Act’s Three-Year Statute of Repose

Authors and Contributors

Adam Hakki

Senior Partner

诉讼

+1 212 848 4924

+1 212 848 4924

纽约

Stuart J. Baskin

返聘高级顾问

诉讼

+1 212 848 4974

+1 212 848 4974

纽约

Matthew L. Craner

合伙人

诉讼

+1 212 848 5255

+1 212 848 5255

纽约

Kirsten Nelson Cunha

返聘高级顾问

诉讼

+1 212 848 4320

+1 212 848 4320

纽约

Agnès Dunogué

合伙人

诉讼

+1 212 848 5257

+1 212 848 5257

纽约

Alan S. Goudiss

合伙人

诉讼

+1 212 848 4906

+1 212 848 4906

纽约

John Gueli

合伙人

诉讼

+1 212 848 4744

+1 212 848 4744

纽约

Daniel H.R. Laguardia

合伙人

诉讼

+1 415 616 1114

+1 415 616 1114

+1 212 848 4731

+1 212 848 4731

旧金山

Daniel Lewis

合伙人

诉讼

+1 212 848 8691

+1 212 848 8691

纽约

John A. Nathanson

合伙人

诉讼

+1 212 848 8611

+1 212 848 8611

纽约

业务